WebA case was decided this week in the London Central Employment Tribunal (Dewhurst v Revisecatch) which has dramatic ramifications for employers. The Tribunal’s decision is that, where there is a transfer covered by the Transfer Regulations, individuals who are properly classified as “workers” are covered by the Transfer Regulations. WebDec 13, 2024 · The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) provide important protection and rights to employees who work for a business that is transferred to another organisation or provide a service that is outsourced or brought back inhouse. But the decision in Dewhurst v Revisecatch & City Sprint has potentially ...

TUPE protection extends to workers as well as employees (ET ...

WebYour browser does not support our videos. Please click here to download a modern browser. WebDec 2, 2024 · Dewhurst and Others v Revisecatch Limited t/as Ecourier and City Sprint (UK) Ltd* The Claimants in this case are cycle couriers, they worked for Ecourier on its … the pso algorithm

TUPE - Potentially Important Decision - LinkedIn

WebDec 9, 2024 · Yes, according to the decision in Dewhurst v Revisecatch & City Sprint.Employment Judge Joffe, sitting alone in the London Central Employment Tribunal, found that an individual who is not an employee but still falls into the category of 'worker' should be viewed as an 'employee' for the purposes of the Transfer of Undertakings … WebBrennan v J.H. Dewhurst Ltd [1984] ICR 52, EAT (1983 May 20 - Browne-Wilkinson J., Mr. R. V. Cooper and Mr. T. H. Jenkins ) Case Summary Authority for the proposition that:- WebNov 28, 2024 · The case concerned cycle couriers who claimed they automatically transferred from City Sprint to Revisecatch when the former lost and the latter won a … the psoas book by liz koch